is suntek's ultravision best bang for buck?

[jttint1]

someone please do the math for me.seems like there's such a slight difference in performance compared to other highline films mentioned on the forum,but ultravision is priced soo much less.

[Guest tintjam65]

Guess they dont teach that old adage anymore.

You know

You get what you pay for.

[micro-edge]

I like it,custys like it so I say win-win

[Guest tintjam65]

Or, Maybe they don't like gouging their dealers, for film that doesn't cost that much more to make. , just a though

You can't mean the film I'm use is gouging me.

Another thought?

Some see farther down the road than others. IMO

[Guest vclimber]

Guess they dont teach that old adage anymore.

You know

Or, Maybe they don't like gouging their dealers, for film that doesn't cost that much more to make. , just a though

You get what you pay for.

No, they just don't have a problem with reporting misleading performance data. So who gets gouged in the long run?

Or, Maybe they don't like gouging their dealers, for film that doesn't cost that much more to make. , just a though

You can't mean the film I'm use is gouging me.

Another thought?

Some see farther down the road than others. IMO

I like looking down that road.

[jttint1]

so........I should start pushing ultravision instead of others? I see the 3m crystalline has similar numbers compared to ultravision at half the price.serious answers.......

[addicted to tint]

so........I should start pushing ultravision instead of others? I see the 3m crystalline has similar numbers compared to ultravision at half the price.serious answers.......

First I thought you were talking flat, now you refer to Crystalline - auto???

The main concern you may have away from film construction and performance might be an open ended sales policy to literally any dealer waving a buck. If your competition falls into the right category, that same film you would be pushing may be offered to a competitor at a significant discount to the price you pay. Where would that leave you? If none of that matters on your end sell on. Judging from your signature statement it probably matters.....

[Guest vclimber]

so........I should start pushing ultravision instead of others? I see the 3m crystalline has similar numbers compared to ultravision at half the price.serious answers.......

First I thought you were talking flat, now you refer to Crystalline - auto???

The main concern you may have away from film construction and performance might be an open ended sales policy to literally any dealer waving a buck. If your competition falls into the right category, that same film you would be pushing may be offered to a competitor at a significant discount to the price you pay. Where would that leave you? If none of that matters on your end sell on. Judging from your signature statement it probably matters.....

How about performance longevity too?

[tint_audiopros]

ST is not making ULV. for auto anymore, thats why they came out with CXP (carbon xp).

[Roach]

No, they just don't have a problem with reporting misleading performance data. So who gets gouged in the long run?

As far as their FG films - anyone know if/when the results will be ready for the nfrc cert?