Guest metro jim Posted December 3, 2008 Report Share Posted December 3, 2008 All information regarding fines will be listed for every single PLANT/Facility here in the US, though not all information is. There was another site that listed all environmental releases over the regulated amount and for the life of me I cant find it. Any action resulting in a multimillion dollar fine would more then likely be for an enviromental clean up. Being that the FTI/Solamatrix facility is located in a "watershed" any toxic release would be a major issue and would not be difficult to look up. I am not a sungard or solamatrix user either (I have 2 very old boxes) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carmeltinting.com Posted December 3, 2008 Report Share Posted December 3, 2008 I was told by an industry insider that SolaMatrix got hit with a huge Million $ fine from the EPA because their equipment was in violation of EPA standards. Their defense was they were "grandfathered" in as SunGard. But the NEW owners are NOT grandfathered in. They are considered a NEW company thus in violation.Nice spin on the story though, I give them that. It's funny how the alleged fine is about as much as the cost of the new equipment. Why don't you call your "insider" and ask them to send you some proof that this EPA fine actually happened? A million dollar EPA fine would definitely be newsworthy (For example, US Glass Magazine reported a $15k EPA fine on Rossford Glass) and no one can seem to fine anything. Good point. I may do just that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Texstar Posted December 3, 2008 Report Share Posted December 3, 2008 I was told by an industry insider that SolaMatrix got hit with a huge Million $ fine from the EPA because their equipment was in violation of EPA standards. Their defense was they were "grandfathered" in as SunGard. But the NEW owners are NOT grandfathered in. They are considered a NEW company thus in violation.Nice spin on the story though, I give them that. It's funny how the alleged fine is about as much as the cost of the new equipment. Why don't you call your "insider" and ask them to send you some proof that this EPA fine actually happened? A million dollar EPA fine would definitely be newsworthy (For example, US Glass Magazine reported a $15k EPA fine on Rossford Glass) and no one can seem to fine anything. Good point. I may do just that. If you cant back it up and provide proof your going to continue to look like a gabby gossip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tint Artist Posted December 5, 2008 Report Share Posted December 5, 2008 I don't know Captain Bill from Captain Crunch sorry to go off topic but that's just fuggin' funny Sorry I was watching the action and like Blade....that was friggin funny!! ok I'm leaving Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tintinater Posted December 5, 2008 Report Share Posted December 5, 2008 The Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) converts Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) to carbon dioxide and water vapor through thermal oxidation. RTOs use regenerative heat transfer to achieve very high thermal efficiencies, which results in very low fuel cost. Through flow reversal, process gas is alternately heated then cooled in the thermal energy recovery chambers prior to being exhausted to atmosphere. I have a question....what does this machine have to do with making the film better? It looks like all it does is clean up the exhaust coming from the plant. And who is "Miss Informed"? Did you mean "misinformed"? (sorry, I couldn't resist) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest vclimber Posted December 5, 2008 Report Share Posted December 5, 2008 The Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) converts Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) to carbon dioxide and water vapor through thermal oxidation. RTOs use regenerative heat transfer to achieve very high thermal efficiencies, which results in very low fuel cost. Through flow reversal, process gas is alternately heated then cooled in the thermal energy recovery chambers prior to being exhausted to atmosphere.I have a question....what does this machine have to do with making the film better? It looks like all it does is clean up the exhaust coming from the plant. And who is "Miss Informed"? Did you mean "misinformed"? (sorry, I couldn't resist) Miss Informed is Gabby Gossip's sister. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tintinater Posted December 5, 2008 Report Share Posted December 5, 2008 nice!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tintgod Posted December 5, 2008 Report Share Posted December 5, 2008 This equipment will also make our laminating lines more efficient and produce cleaner and consistent window films. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest vclimber Posted December 5, 2008 Report Share Posted December 5, 2008 nice!!! Thanks I'll be here all night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Texstar Posted December 5, 2008 Report Share Posted December 5, 2008 The Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer (RTO) converts Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) to carbon dioxide and water vapor through thermal oxidation. RTOs use regenerative heat transfer to achieve very high thermal efficiencies, which results in very low fuel cost. Through flow reversal, process gas is alternately heated then cooled in the thermal energy recovery chambers prior to being exhausted to atmosphere.I have a question....what does this machine have to do with making the film better? It looks like all it does is clean up the exhaust coming from the plant. And who is "Miss Informed"? Did you mean "misinformed"? (sorry, I couldn't resist) Miss Informed is Gabby Gossip's sister. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.